INTJ

[xoxo]

Portrait of an INTJ - Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging
(Introverted Intuition with Extraverted Thinking)
The Scientist

As an INTJ, your primary mode of living is focused internally, where you take things in primarily via your intuition. Your secondary mode is external, where you deal with things rationally and logically.

INTJs live in the world of ideas and strategic planning. They value intelligence, knowledge, and competence, and typically have high standards in these regards, which they continuously strive to fulfill. To a somewhat lesser extent, they have similar expectations of others.

With Introverted Intuition dominating their personality, INTJs focus their energy on observing the world, and generating ideas and possibilities. Their mind constantly gathers information and makes associations about it. They are tremendously insightful and usually are very quick to understand new ideas. However, their primary interest is not understanding a concept, but rather applying that concept in a useful way. Unlike the INTP, they do not follow an idea as far as they possibly can, seeking only to understand it fully. INTJs are driven to come to conclusions about ideas. Their need for closure and organization usually requires that they take some action.

INTJ's tremendous value and need for systems and organization, combined with their natural insightfulness, makes them excellent scientists. An INTJ scientist gives a gift to society by putting their ideas into a useful form for others to follow. It is not easy for the INTJ to express their internal images, insights, and abstractions. The internal form of the INTJ's thoughts and concepts is highly individualized, and is not readily translatable into a form that others will understand. However, the INTJ is driven to translate their ideas into a plan or system that is usually readily explainable, rather than to do a direct translation of their thoughts. They usually don't see the value of a direct transaction, and will also have difficulty expressing their ideas, which are non-linear. However, their extreme respect of knowledge and intelligence will motivate them to explain themselves to another person who they feel is deserving of the effort.

INTJs are natural leaders, although they usually choose to remain in the background until they see a real need to take over the lead. When they are in leadership roles, they are quite effective, because they are able to objectively see the reality of a situation, and are adaptable enough to change things which aren't working well. They are the supreme strategists - always scanning available ideas and concepts and weighing them against their current strategy, to plan for every conceivable contingency.

INTJs spend a lot of time inside their own minds, and may have little interest in the other people's thoughts or feelings. Unless their Feeling side is developed, they may have problems giving other people the level of intimacy that is needed. Unless their Sensing side is developed, they may have a tendency to ignore details which are necessary for implementing their ideas.

The INTJ's interest in dealing with the world is to make decisions, express judgments, and put everything that they encounter into an understandable and rational system. Consequently, they are quick to express judgments. Often they have very evolved intuitions, and are convinced that they are right about things. Unless they complement their intuitive understanding with a well-developed ability to express their insights, they may find themselves frequently misunderstood. In these cases, INTJs tend to blame misunderstandings on the limitations of the other party, rather than on their own difficulty in expressing themselves. This tendency may cause the INTJ to dismiss others input too quickly, and to become generally arrogant and elitist.

INTJs are ambitious, self-confident, deliberate, long-range thinkers. Many INTJs end up in engineering or scientific pursuits, although some find enough challenge within the business world in areas which involve organizing and strategic planning. They dislike messiness and inefficiency, and anything that is muddled or unclear. They value clarity and efficiency, and will put enormous amounts of energy and time into consolidating their insights into structured patterns.

Other people may have a difficult time understanding an INTJ. They may see them as aloof and reserved. Indeed, the INTJ is not overly demonstrative of their affections, and is likely to not give as much praise or positive support as others may need or desire. That doesn't mean that he or she doesn't truly have affection or regard for others, they simply do not typically feel the need to express it. Others may falsely perceive the INTJ as being rigid and set in their ways. Nothing could be further from the truth, because the INTJ is committed to always finding the objective best strategy to implement their ideas. The INTJ is usually quite open to hearing an alternative way of doing something.

When under a great deal of stress, the INTJ may become obsessed with mindless repetitive, Sensate activities, such as over-drinking. They may also tend to become absorbed with minutia and details that they would not normally consider important to their overall goal.

INTJs need to remember to express themselves sufficiently, so as to avoid difficulties with people misunderstandings. In the absence of properly developing their communication abilities, they may become abrupt and short with people, and isolationists.

INTJs have a tremendous amount of ability to accomplish great things. They have insight into the Big Picture, and are driven to synthesize their concepts into solid plans of action. Their reasoning skills gives them the means to accomplish that. INTJs are most always highly competent people, and will not have a problem meeting their career or education goals. They have the capability to make great strides in these arenas. On a personal level, the INTJ who practices tolerances and puts effort into effectively communicating their insights to others has everything in his or her power to lead a rich and rewarding life.

Jungian functional preference ordering:

Dominant: Introverted Intuition
Auxiliary: Extraverted Thinking
Tertiary: Introverted Feeling
Inferior: Extraverted Sensing

http://www.personalitypage.com/INTJ.html

[xoxo]

INTJ Relationships


INTJs believe in constant growth in relationships, and strive for independence for themselves and their mates. They are constantly embarking on "fix-up" projects to improve the overall quality of their lives and relationships. They take their commitments seriously, but are open to redefining their vows, if they see something which may prove to be an improvement over the existing understanding. INTJs are not likely to be "touchy-feely" and overly affirming with their mates or children, and may at times be somewhat insensitive to their emotional needs. However, INTJs are in general extremely capable and intelligent individuals who strive to always be their best, and be moving in a positive direction. If they apply these basic goals to their personal relationships, they likely to enjoy happy and healthy interaction with their families and friends.

INTJ Strengths

Not threatened by conflict or criticism
Usually self-confident
Take their relationships and commitments seriously
Generally extremely intelligent and capable
Able to leave a relationship which should be ended, although they may dwell on it in their minds for awhile afterwards
Interested in "optimizing" their relationships
Good listeners

INTJ Weaknesses

Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times
May tend to respond to conflict with logic and reason, rather than the desired emotional support
Not naturally good at expressing feelings and affections
Tendency to believe that they're always right
Tendency to be unwilling or unable to accept blame
Their constant quest to improve everything may be taxing on relationships
Tend to hold back part of themselves

INTJs as Lovers

"To love means to open ourselves to the negative as well as the positive - to grief, sorrow, and disappointment as well as to joy, fulfillment, and an intensity of consciousness we did not know was possible before." -- Rollo May

INTJs live much of their lives inside their own heads. They constantly scan their environment for new ideas and theories which they can turn into plans and structures. Sometimes, what they see and understand intuitively within themselves is more pure and "perfect" than the reality of a close personal relationship. INTJs may have a problem reconciling their reality with their fantasy.

INTJs are not naturally in tune with their own feelings, or with what other people are feeling. They also have a tendency to believe that they are always right. While their self-confidence and esteem is attractive, their lack of sensitivity to others can be a problem if it causes them to inadvertantly hurt their partner's feelings. If this is a problem for an INTJ, they should remember to sometimes let their mate be the one who is right, and to try to be aware of the emotional effect that your words have upon them. In conflict situations, INTJs need to remember to be supportive to their mate's emotional needs, rather than treating the conflict as if it is an interesting idea to analyze.

Sexually, the INTJ enjoys thinking about intimacy, and about ways to perfect it. In positive relationships, their creativity and intensity shine through in this arena. In more negative relationships, they might enjoy thinking about sex more than actually doing it. They're likely to approach intimacy from a theoretical, creative perspective, rather than as an opportunity to express love and affection. Although, the INTJ who has learned the importance of these kinds of expressions to the health of their relationship is likely to be more verbally affectionate.

INTJs are able to leave relationships when they're over, and get on with their lives. They believe that this is the right thing to do. They may have more difficulty accomplishing the task than they like to exhibit to other people.

INTJs are highly intense, intelligent people who bring a lot of depth and insight into most major areas of their life. In terms of relationships, their greatest potential pitfall is the tendency to think about things rather than doing them, and their difficulty reconciling reality with their inner visions. INTJs are likely to be in positive, healthy relationships, because they're likely to leave relationships which aren't working for them (unless other circumstances prohibit that).

Although two well-developed individuals of any type can enjoy a healthy relationship, the INTJ's natural partner is the ENFP, or the ENTP. INTJ's dominant function of Introverted Intuition is best matched with a partner whose personality is dominated by Extraverted Intuition. How did we arrive at this?

INTJs as Parents

"You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth...
Let your bending in the archer's hand be for gladness;
For even as He loves the arrow that flies,
so He loves also the bow that is stable." -- Kahlil Gibran

As parents, INTJ's main goal is to raise their children to be intelligent, autonomous and independent. They want their kids to think for themselves and make their own decisions, and so are likely to give them room to grow, and to challenge their decisions and thoughts at key points in their lives.

The INTJ is not naturally likely to be an overly supportive or loving parental figure. Since their own need for expressions of love and affirmation is relatively low, they may have difficulty seeing that need in their children who have Feeling preferences. If they do see this sensitivity, they may not recognize or value the importance of feeding it. In such situations, there will be a distance between the INTJ and the child. This is a problem area for the INTJ, who should consciously remember to be aware of others' emotional needs.

INTJs as Friends

INTJs are usually difficult to get to know well, and difficult to get close to. Those who are close to the INTJ will highly value them for their ideas and knowledge. Although INTJs are generally very serious-minded people, they also have been known to enjoy letting loose and having fun, if others pull them into it. They also can be really good at telling jokes, and exhibiting a sarcastic wit with a poker face.

The INTJ is not likely to choose to spend time with people who they feel don't have anything to offer the INTJ. They especially like to spend time with other Intuitive Thinkers, and also usually enjoy the company of Intuitive Feelers. These personality types love to theorize and speculate about ideas, and so can usually relate well to the INTJ, who loves to analyze ideas.

Many INTJs believe that they are always right. In some INTJs, this belief is quite obvious, while in others it is more subtle. Some people may have a difficult time accepting what they see as a "superior attitude" or "snobbery". Not to imply that INTJs are snobbish, just that some people with strong Feeling preferences may perceive them that way. And some individuals simply have no interest in the theoretical pursuits which the INTJ enjoys.

https://www.personalitypage.com/html/INTJ_rel.html

[timmy]

tldr

[juji]

Lisa, suck my long and fat dick

[xoxo]

Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging
by Marina Margaret Heiss

Profile: INTJ
Revision: 3.1
Date of Revision: 17 Oct 2009

To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.

INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.

INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.

In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.

Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.

This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.

Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.

Functional Analysis
by Joe Butt
Introverted iNtuition
INTJs are idea people. Anything is possible; everything is negotiable. Whatever the outer circumstances, INTJs are ever perceiving inner pattern-forms and using real-world materials to operationalize them. Others may see what is and wonder why; INTJs see what might be and say "Why not?!" Paradoxes, antinomies, and other contradictory phenomena aptly express these intuitors' amusement at those whom they feel may be taking a particular view of reality too seriously. INTJs enjoy developing unique solutions to complex problems.
Extraverted Thinking
Thinking in this auxiliary role is a workhorse. Closure is the payoff for efforts expended. Evaluation begs diagnosis; product drives process. As they come to light, Thinking tends, protects, affirms and directs iNtuition's offspring, fully equipping them for fulfilling and useful lives. A faithful pedagogue, Thinking argues not so much on its own behalf, but in defense of its charges. And through this process these impressionable ideas take on the likeness of their master.
Introverted Feeling
Feeling has a modest inner room, two doors down from the Most Imminent iNtuition. It doesn't get out much, but lends its influence on behalf of causes which are Good and Worthy and Humane. We may catch a glimpse of it in the unspoken attitude of good will, or the gracious smile or nod. Some question the existence of Feeling in this type, yet its unseen balance to Thinking is a cardinal dimension in the full measure of the INTJ's soul.
Extraverted Sensing
Sensing serves with a good will, or not at all. As other inferior functions, it has only a rudimentary awareness of context, amount or degree. Thus INTJs sweat the details or, at times, omit them. "I've made up my mind, don't confuse me with the facts" could well have been said by an INTJ on a mission. Sensing's extraverted attitude is evident in this type's bent to savor sensations rather than to merely categorize them. Indiscretions of indulgence are likely an expression of the unconscious vengeance of the inferior.
Famous INTJs:
Susan B. Anthony
Lance Armstrong
Arthur Ashe, tennis champion
Augustus Caesar (Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus)
Jane Austen (Pride and Prejudice)
Dan Aykroyd (The Blues Brothers)
William J. Bennett, "drug czar"
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Raymond Burr (Perry Mason, Ironsides)
Chevy Chase (Cornelius Crane) (Fletch)
Katie Couric
Phil Donahue
Michael Dukakis, governor of Mass., 1988 U.S. Dem. pres. candidate
Richard Gere (Pretty Woman)
Rudy Giuliani, former New York City mayor
Greg Gumbel, television sportscaster
Hannibal, Carthaginian military leader
Emily Bronte, author of Wuthering Heights
Angela Lansbury (Murder, She Wrote)
Orel Leonard Hershiser, IV
Peter Jennings
Charles Everett Koop
Ivan Lendl
C. S. Lewis (The Chronicles of Narnia)
Joan Lunden
Edwin Moses, U.S. olympian (hurdles)
Martina Navratilova
Michelle Obama
General Colin Powell, former US Secretary of State
Charles Rangel, US Representative, D-N.Y.
Pernell Roberts (Bonanza)
Donald Rumsfeld, former US Secretary of Defense
Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of California
Josephine Tey (Elizabeth Mackintosh), mystery writer (Brat Farrar)

U.S. Presidents:
Chester A. Arthur
Calvin Coolidge
Thomas Jefferson
John F. Kennedy
James K. Polk
Woodrow Wilson

Fictional:
Cassius (Julius Caesar)
Mr. Darcy (Pride and Prejudice)
Gandalf the Grey (J. R. R. Tolkein's Middle Earth books)
Hannibal Lecter (Silence of the Lambs)
Professor Moriarty, Sherlock Holmes' nemesis
Horatio Hornblower
Ensign Ro (Star Trek--the Next Generation)
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (Hamlet)
George Smiley, John le Carre's master spy
Clarice Starling (Silence of the Lambs)

Copyright © 2012 by Marina Margaret Heiss and Joe Butt
http://typelogic.com/intj.htm

[dcent]

oh ya.

cause Im going to read that.

[xoxo]

Lisa, suck my long and fat dickstop trying to arouse me

[dcent]

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswords


wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword
swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordsw
ordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword

swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswor

dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswo

rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo rdswordswordswordswordswordsw

ordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordw ordswordswordswordswordswords

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo
rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo rdswordswordswordswordswordsw

ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor

dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswordswordswo rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dsw

ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor

dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordsword
swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords
wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords
wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw
ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw
ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ord

swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswor

dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswo

rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo rdsswordswordswordswordswords

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswords

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords s
wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw
ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ords

[UofLCardfan08]

Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging
by Marina Margaret Heiss

Profile: INTJ
Revision: 3.1
Date of Revision: 17 Oct 2009

To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.

INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.

INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.

In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.

Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.

This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.

Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.

Functional Analysis
by Joe Butt
Introverted iNtuition
INTJs are idea people. Anything is possible; everything is negotiable. Whatever the outer circumstances, INTJs are ever perceiving inner pattern-forms and using real-world materials to operationalize them. Others may see what is and wonder why; INTJs see what might be and say "Why not?!" Paradoxes, antinomies, and other contradictory phenomena aptly express these intuitors' amusement at those whom they feel may be taking a particular view of reality too seriously. INTJs enjoy developing unique solutions to complex problems.
Extraverted Thinking
Thinking in this auxiliary role is a workhorse. Closure is the payoff for efforts expended. Evaluation begs diagnosis; product drives process. As they come to light, Thinking tends, protects, affirms and directs iNtuition's offspring, fully equipping them for fulfilling and useful lives. A faithful pedagogue, Thinking argues not so much on its own behalf, but in defense of its charges. And through this process these impressionable ideas take on the likeness of their master.
Introverted Feeling
Feeling has a modest inner room, two doors down from the Most Imminent iNtuition. It doesn't get out much, but lends its influence on behalf of causes which are Good and Worthy and Humane. We may catch a glimpse of it in the unspoken attitude of good will, or the gracious smile or nod. Some question the existence of Feeling in this type, yet its unseen balance to Thinking is a cardinal dimension in the full measure of the INTJ's soul.
Extraverted Sensing
Sensing serves with a good will, or not at all. As other inferior functions, it has only a rudimentary awareness of context, amount or degree. Thus INTJs sweat the details or, at times, omit them. "I've made up my mind, don't confuse me with the facts" could well have been said by an INTJ on a mission. Sensing's extraverted attitude is evident in this type's bent to savor sensations rather than to merely categorize them. Indiscretions of indulgence are likely an expression of the unconscious vengeance of the inferior.
Famous INTJs:
Susan B. Anthony
Lance Armstrong
Arthur Ashe, tennis champion
Augustus Caesar (Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus)
Jane Austen (Pride and Prejudice)
Dan Aykroyd (The Blues Brothers)
William J. Bennett, "drug czar"
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Raymond Burr (Perry Mason, Ironsides)
Chevy Chase (Cornelius Crane) (Fletch)
Katie Couric
Phil Donahue
Michael Dukakis, governor of Mass., 1988 U.S. Dem. pres. candidate
Richard Gere (Pretty Woman)
Rudy Giuliani, former New York City mayor
Greg Gumbel, television sportscaster
Hannibal, Carthaginian military leader
Emily Bronte, author of Wuthering Heights
Angela Lansbury (Murder, She Wrote)
Orel Leonard Hershiser, IV
Peter Jennings
Charles Everett Koop
Ivan Lendl
C. S. Lewis (The Chronicles of Narnia)
Joan Lunden
Edwin Moses, U.S. olympian (hurdles)
Martina Navratilova
Michelle Obama
General Colin Powell, former US Secretary of State
Charles Rangel, US Representative, D-N.Y.
Pernell Roberts (Bonanza)
Donald Rumsfeld, former US Secretary of Defense
Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of California
Josephine Tey (Elizabeth Mackintosh), mystery writer (Brat Farrar)

U.S. Presidents:
Chester A. Arthur
Calvin Coolidge
Thomas Jefferson
John F. Kennedy
James K. Polk
Woodrow Wilson

Fictional:
Cassius (Julius Caesar)
Mr. Darcy (Pride and Prejudice)
Gandalf the Grey (J. R. R. Tolkein's Middle Earth books)
Hannibal Lecter (Silence of the Lambs)
Professor Moriarty, Sherlock Holmes' nemesis
Horatio Hornblower
Ensign Ro (Star Trek--the Next Generation)
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (Hamlet)
George Smiley, John le Carre's master spy
Clarice Starling (Silence of the Lambs)

Copyright © 2012 by Marina Margaret Heiss and Joe Butt
http://typelogic.com/intj.htm

I'm INTJ and you are sucking dick

Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message

Collapse Details

#6
dcent
dcent is offline
I stab the homeless. dcent's Avatar

Join Date
Oct 2012
Location
in paul allens apartment
Posts
661

55 Minutes Ago Add to this user's reputation Report Post

oh ya.

cause Im going to read that.

Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message

Collapse Details

#7
xoxo
xoxo is offline
Tourette's Love Troll xoxo's Avatar

Join Date
Nov 2012
Posts
1,084

55 Minutes Ago Add to this user's reputation Report Post

Originally Posted by juji View Post
Lisa, suck my long and fat dick
stop trying to arouse me

I'm INTJ and you are sucking dick

Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message

Collapse Details

#8
dcent
dcent is offline
I stab the homeless. dcent's Avatar

Join Date
Oct 2012
Location
in paul allens apartment
Posts
661

49 Minutes Ago Add to this user's reputation Report Post

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswords


wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword
swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordsw
ordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword

swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswor

dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswo

rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo rdswordswordswordswordswordsw

ordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordw ordswordswordswordswordswords

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo
rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo rdswordswordswordswordswordsw

ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor

dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswordswordswo rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dsw

ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor

dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordsword
swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords
wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords
wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw
ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw
ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordsswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ord

swordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsword swordswordswordswordswordswor

dswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswor dswordswordswordswordswordswo

rdswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswo rdsswordswordswordswordswords

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswords

wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords s
wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordwordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw
ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordsw ords

[Cody]

YOUTUBE VIDEOS AND WHAT NOT

[steveyos]

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

[blumpkin blownuts]

INTJ's as posters
INTJ's have nothing new to add to a discussion. They have nothing at all to add except their archetypal propensity towards :dinorage: which most scientists agree "gets old fast".

[xoxo]

INTJ's as posters
INTJ's have nothing new to add to a discussion. They have nothing at all to add except their archetypal propensity towards :dinorage: which most scientists agree "gets old fast".INTJs are the scientists

I'm INTJ and you are sucking dick

[juji]

I'm INTJ and you are sucking dick

[juji]

i don't get why Lisa loves to suck dick

[xoxo]

i don't get why Lisa loves to suck dick

It gets me off

[blumpkin blownuts]

lol lisa r sciencetits loololooloooooo
you're a hack philosopher you are way far away from scientist and you're not good enough to be a real INTJ
you are a dreamer

[xoxo]

lol lisa r sciencetits loololooloooooo
you're a hack philosopher you are way far away from scientist and you're not good enough to be a real INTJ
you are a dreamer
I asked everyone when I joined here what personality they were and you were an INTP you inferior jealous and more stupid loser

[blumpkin blownuts]

I asked everyone when I joined here what personality they were and you were an INTP you inferior jealous and more stupid loser

WROOOOOONG BITCH, YOU FAIL YET AGAIN WHY ARE YOU SUCH A STUPID BITCH YA STUPID BITCH


you mean this thread?
http://rubycalaber.com/forums/showthread.php?2670-What-is-your-Myer-Briggs-personality-type&highlight=INTP

I didn't even post mine. Someone else said they are INTP.
I wasn't even here the month of september, which explains why I don't remember you asking.
I am not INTP i am INTJ, and a bona fide one, unlike you.

[blumpkin blownuts]

fucking fake ass INTJ wannabee thinks she can remember things in her stoned fucking brain
get out now

[xoxo]

WROOOOOONG BITCH, YOU FAIL YET AGAIN WHY ARE YOU SUCH A STUPID BITCH YA STUPID BITCH


you mean this thread?
http://rubycalaber.com/forums/showthread.php?2670-What-is-your-Myer-Briggs-personality-type&highlight=INTP

I didn't even post mine. Someone else said they are INTP.
I wasn't even here the month of september, which explains why I don't remember you asking.
I am not INTP i am INTJ, and a bona fide one, unlike you.
Here we can see many months ago me asking people's types and that I am INTJ, therefore you can see how blownut did NOT say he was INTJ and is now in some pathetic little jealous rage and trying to copy my personality type which the half-wit doesn't even fit

Jibbles was an INTJ

You're just a fucking dickhead

[blumpkin blownuts]

read much



I wasn't even here the month of september, which explains why I don't remember you asking.

[blumpkin blownuts]

thanks to you i did get to see an enjoyable thread
plug drugs sure put your pseudoscientific ass in its place

[steveyos]

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

[steveyos]

shut the fuck up

[xoxo]

thanks to you i did get to see an enjoyable thread
plug drugs sure put your pseudoscientific ass in its place

I'm not the half-wit who believes in god and fairies, that is you

I believe in the tangible and there is literally no way that your idiotic personality fits INTJ

Stop embarrassing yourself

[steveyos]

shut the fuck up!

[blumpkin blownuts]

shut the fuck up!

and leave. you have no dignity here left to lose lisa - you've been absolutely drained of what little you had when you joined.

[blumpkin blownuts]

and read this on your way out:

Famous Scientists Who Believed in God

Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)
Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and urged Copernicus to publish it around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution - and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the Bible.

Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627)
Bacon was a philosopher who is known for establishing the scientific method of inquiry based on experimentation and inductive reasoning. In De Interpretatione Naturae Prooemium, Bacon established his goals as being the discovery of truth, service to his country, and service to the church. Although his work was based upon experimentation and reasoning, he rejected atheism as being the result of insufficient depth of philosophy, stating, "It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity." (Of Atheism)

Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the sun-centered system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600) when other Protestants had been expelled!

Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centered system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favorite argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended. After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centered system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work, which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, and saw his system as an alternate interpretation of the biblical texts.

Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a Roman Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences - can we trust our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted to see was that his philosophy be adopted as standard Roman Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.

Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
Love Your God With All Your Mind: The Role of Reason in the Life of the SoulPascal was a French mathematician, physicist, inventor, writer and theologian. In mathematics, he published a treatise on the subject of projective geometry and established the foundation for probability theory. Pascal invented a mechanical calculator, and established the principles of vacuums and the pressure of air. He was raised a Roman Catholic, but in 1654 had a religious vision of God, which turned the direction of his study from science to theology. Pascal began publishing a theological work, Lettres provinciales, in 1656. His most influential theological work, the Pensées ("Thoughts"), was a defense of Christianity, which was published after his death. The most famous concept from Pensées was Pascal's Wager. Pascal's last words were, "May God never abandon me."

Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding God's plan for history from the Bible. He did a considerable work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology was very important. In his system of physics, God was essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."

Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gases, and also wrote an important work on chemistry. Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, 'for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels...' As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.

Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Michael Faraday was the son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but led to much of our lifestyles today, which depends on them (including computers and telephone lines and, so, web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and interpreted nature. Originating from Presbyterians, the Sandemanians rejected the idea of state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.

Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism". He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the 1860's was notable for formation of the X-Club, which was dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of "conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science while, at around the same time, an Austrian monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect Galton's contribution.

William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907)
Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern physics. His work covered many areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities, which recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, who was certainly more religious than the average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal, apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about radiogenic heating).

Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/sciencefaith.html

[steveyos]

STFU is a syndrome lisa needs

[xoxo]

and leave. you have no dignity here left to lose lisa - you've been absolutely drained of what little you had when you joined.

Um that was steveyos you retard

Also the "scientists" you listed are not INTJ and neither are you

Posting irrelevant shit about god certainly proves you aren't INTJ and all you'd have to do is post a test, the questions and your answers and results... but I think it's pretty clear that you are NOT INTJ

[blumpkin blownuts]

i last took it years ago
i could take it again but why bother, you'll just say i cheated and forced a INTJ result
after all, that's what you've obviously done

[steveyos]

gtfo you have retard brain

[xoxo]

If you were INTJ you'd know the test can't really be cheated

You're making a total idiot of yourself

There is literally no way you have INTJ traits you have done nothing but back up that I am and that you are having some kind of pathetic jealous rage because I'm intellectually superior to you which doesn't actually have anything to do with personality type but rather IQ, just so happens my personality type has the highest number of geniuses, you are not a genius or an INTJ

I however am

Suck it you pathetic loser

[steveyos]

don't Care

[blumpkin blownuts]

If you were INTJ you'd know the test can't really be cheated

You're making a total idiot of yourself

There is literally no way you have INTJ traits you have done nothing but back up that I am and that you are having some kind of pathetic jealous rage because I'm intellectually superior to you which doesn't actually have anything to do with personality type but rather IQ, just so happens my personality type has the highest number of geniuses, you are not a genius or an INTJ

I however am

Suck it you pathetic loser


you're about to be wrong YET AGAIN

[blumpkin blownuts]

BOOOOOOOM

http://i.imgur.com/XJ7mo.jpg

you're proven wrong about not being able to take the test to intentionally get a desired type
you were also proven wrong about me posting in your fucking thread that I am an INTP

you wanna go for broke tonight, honey? test me again. beeeitchahhhhh

[blumpkin blownuts]

oh and here's my scores with heartfelt answers, probably much more polarized INTJ than yours
Introverted (I) 74.29% Extroverted (E) 25.71%
Intuitive (N) 52.5% Sensing (S) 47.5%
Thinking (T) 69.23% Feeling (F) 30.77%
Judging (J) 59.46% Perceiving (P) 40.54%

[blumpkin blownuts]

and as far as IQ goes...

you seem to really want me to think you are more intelligent than me, well i say put your money where your mouth is, just be warned that i am not going to quizbowl with you unless you swear on your life that you'll reward me when i win this time -- by voluntarily confining yourself to the herpetarium.

[xoxo]

oh god I go out for a few hours and this fucking retarded loser is still at it

get a life

[blumpkin blownuts]

i went out too slut
ph34r my amazing brain

[xoxo]

after multiple postings in my topics desperate for my attention

You're not even smart, you're boring, pathetic and stupid and always sniffing my ass

get a life

[blumpkin blownuts]

you're sure a sore loser
how embarrassing for you

[blumpkin blownuts]

"oh you said you're an intp"
"oh you can't force a mbti result"
"oh im sooooo smart"

wrong on all accounts ya filthy broad and you can't backpedal or spin your way out of it

[xoxo]

I never said any of that you pathetic no-life loser retard

[blumpkin blownuts]

I asked everyone when I joined here what type they were and you did post yours, you were INTP




If you were INTJ you'd know the test can't really be cheated

[blumpkin blownuts]

what's truly funny is i really am an INTJ even without cheating
post your %ages I bet i'm twice the INTJ you claim to be

[xoxo]

I've done that before in the many topics I've made on the subject

don't bother trying to copy me after it's something I've posted about here since I joined months ago

I've ran circles around you in every single topic you've ever attempted to debate with me

make your own god damn intellectual topics you half-wit pathetic no-life moron always sniffing my ass

[blumpkin blownuts]

too lazy to search for that
you won't post them again because you're obviously less polarized

probably 50/50 on one or more metrics, fucking pretender

[xoxo]

LOL what a fucking dipshit

it has nothing to do with how "polarized" you are

LOL what a moron

get a life

am sick and bored of you trying to sniff my ass in every topic and me running circles around you effortlessly

[blumpkin blownuts]

sure it does, someone who barely gets above 50% in a category is more likely to be falsely identified than someone with say 90%
surely even you realize there's a margin of error on these things

and i'm going to sleep much better realizing that your INTJ is probably a bad reading due to statistical error

[xoxo]

^case in point and self evident that bumpkin blownuts is as dumb as dog shit and yet again has no idea what he is talking about

get a life loser